Frisky's Corner
by Frisco Del Rosario
Rekindling the Flame War deck
The mail about Blink continues to trickle in. One reader suggests
that Blink is the "light saber with which the Blinker uses the Force",
and another says "put up or shut up" while offering a $500 challenge
match.
I've been getting more mail than usual about my attitude lately,
but it's just a coincidence that I've revived a Newsgroup Taunting
deck recently. It's also a coincidence that it's exactly a year
after the first successful Taunting deck was born.
David Liu, who won last year's Pacificon tournament (Nat Johnson
won this year in a constructed/sealed biathlon), was perhaps the
first player to conceive of using Edgerunner, Inc., Temps to install
multiple Newsgroup Tauntings, and sharply limiting the number of
the opponent's runs. Liu dropped the idea because the Taunting deck
was not strong enough to defeat his Loan from Chiba/Bartmoss/Romp
deck.
Joe Ganis passed the idea to me, and I embellished it with Day
Shifts and New Galveston City Grids. On the eve of last year's Pacificon
tournament, I was tuning the deck well into the morning, and trading
for every Taunting in the hotel. I ultimately finished fourth in
the Bay Area's last Wizards-sanctioned NetRunner event, and the
corp deck lost only to two Loan from Chiba decks, which could afford
to pay for the Newsgroup flaming.
Shortly after Pacificon, the Proteus expansion went into full
distribution, and the Taunting deck faded away. Proteus offered
greater bit-gaining machinery to the runner, dampening Newsgroup
Taunting's effect, and the Proteus viruses made it almost impossible
to play with an iceless corporate deck.
I tried adding ice to the deck, but found it too difficult to
balance 10+ Tauntings, agenda, bit gainers, and Edgerunners with
enough ice to keep it all safe. The best I could do towards the
end of the deck's life was to combine Misleading Access Menus with
Encoder, Inc., but was dismayed when viral-minded runners would
pay the Taunting bits, and ignore the unrezzed payback ice. The
last straw was when a runner successfully played a Pirate Broadcast,
picking off all the Tauntings in order, then completing the Broadcast
on the central forts. The runner financed the whole thing with Drone
for a Day, primarily.
Months later, I saw Rob King playing a Taunting deck which combined
Encoder, Inc., with Ball and Chain -- bit for bit, the strongest
ice in the game -- and finding income elsewhere. That's a plan to
explore, readers.
Cheap, weak ice does not suffice to protect a Taunting corporation
in these days of Proteus. Filter, Sleeper, Data Walls 1.0 and 2.0
are not enough of a deterrent, and once the runner has installed
a Skeleton Passkey and a Wrecking Ball, the corporation would rather
draw another Taunting then another ice card.
I spent months thinking about this problem. Sentry ice had to
be the answer. Shock.R is an obvious choice, but how many does the
corporation include in the deck? Where do the bits come from to
install the second row of ice? I couldn't figure it out, and World
Domination soon became my signature deck. (Which other deck types
became extinct with Proteus, I wonder.)
The Frisky AI installment Tin Soldiers reminded me that Too Many
Doors is the least expensive sentry which actually ends the run,
assuming the corporation wins the guessing game. The rap on Too
Many Doors (no pun intended) is that the runner can just run into
it -- hiding zero bits each time -- and bankrupting the corp in
that fashion. Against a Taunting deck, though, the runner has to
pay the Taunting toll before starting each run, and if the runner
doesn't move quickly in search of a sentry breaker, the Taunting
flames will grow.
Another card I've included in this "new, improved" taunting deck
is Fetal AI. Red Herrings is a great card to include in a Taunting
deck if there's room -- Fetal AI has that similar, nifty "runner
must pay 2 to steal Fetal in addition to normal costs" text, and
doesn't force the corp to use another card. The drawback to Fetal
AI is that there is no agenda bonus -- that's not such a problem
in a Taunting deck.
|